WHITE PAPER · 2026

Comparative Evaluation of Whole Urine and Pellet-Based Extraction Workflows for Urine Liquid Biopsy

Explore a recovery-focused approach to processing whole urine without separating the specimen into independent cellular and cell-free workflows.

This white paper describes two complementary studies evaluating whole-urine single extraction versus fractionated processing using the nRichDX Revolution Plus Sample Prep System and Revolution cfTNA workflow.

SPECIMEN Whole Urine
WORKFLOW Single Extraction
PLATFORM Revolution Plus
NRICHDX WHITE PAPER 2026
Comparative Evaluation of Whole Urine and Pellet-Based Extraction Workflows for Urine Liquid Biopsy white paper
URINE LIQUID BIOPSY Whole Urine vs. Fractionated Processing
FEATURED RESOURCE Full White Paper
Sample Whole Urine
Analyte Total Nucleic Acid
Comparison Whole vs. Fractionated
System Revolution Plus
THE UPSTREAM QUESTION

Does urine need to be divided before the molecular workflow begins?

Urine contains molecular material across both cell-free and cell-associated compartments.

Traditional urine-processing workflows may separate the specimen into pellet and supernatant fractions before extraction. That approach introduces additional handling, processing steps, transfers, and ultimately separate molecular workflows.

The nRichDX white paper examines an alternative approach: processing whole urine directly in a single extraction so that molecular material from both compartments can enter one upstream sample-preparation workflow.

TWO WORKFLOW APPROACHES

Fractionate the sample, or process the whole specimen.

The white paper evaluates these upstream approaches under comparable study conditions.

APPROACH 01

Fractionated Processing

START Urine Sample
01 Pellet
02 Supernatant
PROCESS Separate Workflows
INSIDE THE WHITE PAPER

Follow the specimen through the upstream workflow.

The paper focuses on how workflow architecture affects the molecular material carried forward from urine.

01
MOLECULAR COMPARTMENTS

Whole urine contains more than the cell-free fraction.

Evaluate a workflow intended to retain molecular material associated with both the cellular and cell-free components of the specimen.

02
WORKFLOW SIMPLIFICATION

Reduce unnecessary fractionation and transfers.

Compare direct whole-urine processing with workflows that divide the original specimen before extraction.

03
RECOVERY

Evaluate what reaches downstream analysis.

Examine nucleic-acid recovery as an important upstream consideration before downstream molecular testing begins.

DOWNLOAD THE WHITE PAPER

Get the full study discussion.

Complete the form and the white paper will open immediately after submission.

01
Whole-Urine Workflow Single-extraction approach
02
Comparative Evaluation Whole urine vs. fractionated processing
03
Revolution Sample Prep Upstream workflow considerations

Your information is submitted through the existing nRichDX HubSpot form and used in accordance with our Data Privacy Policy.

NRICHDX WHITE PAPER

Download the 2026 Urine White Paper

Complete the form below for immediate access.

2026 whole urine liquid biopsy supporting poster
SUPPORTING DATA · 2026 Liquid Biopsy for Precision Oncology Summit
SUPPORTING SCIENCE

Explore the data behind the whole-urine workflow.

The related 2026 nRichDX poster presents the comparative whole-urine and fractionated-processing study and is available directly in the scientific resource library.